Lots of individual variation in direction and magnitude of changes. The treatment group, at least for the read-aloud task, is a bit less "noisy" and seems to show a stronger trend towards reduction in error rates.
Some higher-level descriptive statistics below. Lots to talk about considering the plot above and table below! L1 Chinese seem to have noticeably higher syllable error rates, but groups showed improvement overall. Back to writing this up...
Segmental Error Rate
|
Syllable Error Rate
|
Combined Error Rate
|
|||||||
Pretest
|
Posttest
|
Pretest
|
Posttest
|
Pretest
|
Posttest
|
||||
n
|
M (SD)
|
M (SD)
|
M (SD)
|
M (SD)
|
M (SD)
|
M (SD)
|
|||
Chinese
|
24
|
0.12 (0.07)
|
0.10 (0.04)
|
0.09 (0.05)
|
0.07 (0.04)
|
0.21 (0.11)
|
0.17 (0.07)
|
||
English
|
47
|
0.10 (0.06)
|
0.08 (0.05)
|
0.05 (0.03)
|
0.04 (0.03)
|
0.15 (0.08)
|
0.12 (0.06)
|
||
1st
Year
|
47
|
0.13 (0.07)
|
0.09 (0.05)
|
0.08 (0.04)
|
0.06 (0.04)
|
0.21 (0.10)
|
0.15 (0.07)
|
||
2nd
Year
|
24
|
0.06 (0.03)
|
0.07 (0.04)
|
0.04 (0.03)
|
0.04 (0.02)
|
0.10 (0.04)
|
0.10 (0.06)
|
||
Treatment
|
38
|
0.11 (0.06)
|
0.08 (0.04)
|
0.06 (0.04)
|
0.05 (0.03)
|
0.17 (0.09)
|
0.13 (0.07)
|
||
Control
|
33
|
0.11 (0.08)
|
0.08 (0.05)
|
0.06 (0.04)
|
0.06 (0.04)
|
0.17 (0.11)
|
0.14 (0.08)
|
||
Picture
|
36
|
0.09 (0.06)
|
0.08 (0.04)
|
0.07 (0.04)
|
0.06 (0.04)
|
0.16 (0.07)
|
0.14 (0.06)
|
||
Read-Aloud
|
35
|
0.12 (0.07)
|
0.08 (0.05)
|
0.06 (0.04)
|
0.04 (0.03)
|
0.18 (0.11)
|
0.13 (0.08)
|
||
All
|
71
|
0.11 (0.07)
|
0.08 (0.05)
|
0.06 (0.04)
|
0.05 (0.04)
|
0.17 (0.10)
|
0.14 (0.07)
|
No comments:
Post a Comment